Description
- Accurate ROM assessment to 1 degree
- Faces & numeric pain scale statistically proven to get a more accurate assessment of patients current pain level
- Ranges provided for ROM of all body region (save time by not having to look up numbers and give patients instant feedback of the ROM they should have)
- Metric & Imperial ruler up to 37 cm / 12 inches
- Pupil gage that can be held over the patients eyes for an accurate reading through clear plastic
- Pocket sized and portable effective clinical outcome marker to quantitatively track patient progress over time
Dimensions (folded): 9 (22 cm) x 2 (5 cm)
Weight: 30 g
“This goniometer has saved me a ton of time in showing patients how they are improving pre and post treatment I can just read the numbers and show them”
“This is a way better system rather than buying a separate pain scale, pupil gage, ruler and ROM reference chat all I need is in one convenient package it saves me time and money!”
“This tool has is the most useful of any goniometer I have ever used! Thank you ProHealth!”
“Simple, effective it [the goniometer] is all I need for accurate assessment and to show my patients how they are improving with treatment great product”
References
Carrie HL, von Baeyera CL, et. al. (2001). The Faces Pain Scale Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain. Volume 93, Issue 2, August 2001, Pages 173183
Giesbrecht K, Craig KD, Bennett S, Huntsman E. (1999). A comparison of faces scales for the measurement of pediatric pain: children’s and parents’ ratings. Pain. 1999;83:2535
Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL & Poole RM (2001) Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94, 149158.
Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C & Silver W (2002) Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 20, 287290.
Jamison RN, Gracely RH, Raymond SA, Levine JG, Marino B, Herrmann TJ, Daly M, Fram D & Katz NP (2002) Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers. Pain 99, 341347.
